<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits - Padove Law]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/categories/class-action-lawsuits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/categories/class-action-lawsuits/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Padove Law's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:41:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Patient Warning for Prescription Drug Use]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/patient-warning-for-prescription-drug-use/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/patient-warning-for-prescription-drug-use/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Prescription drugs are often a target of litigation for a variety of reasons. In some cases, risks relating to prescription drugs are not disclosed to the patient through the drug label so patients cannot truly make an informed decision about the drug to weigh the risks against the benefits. In these cases, a lawsuit may&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Prescription drugs are often a target of litigation for a variety of reasons. In some cases, risks relating to prescription drugs are not disclosed to the patient through the drug label so patients cannot truly make an informed decision about the drug to weigh the risks against the benefits. In these cases, a lawsuit may be appropriate if the patient experiences a serious illness when the risk becomes a reality. In other cases, the drugs are not properly manufactured which may lead to an improper dosage that may pose a risk to a patient.   There are other several reasons why a lawsuit may be brought against the manufacturer of a drug when it relates to a life threatening illness that a patient encounters after taking the drug.     So, the following tips are designed to assist in in preventing the risk of a life threatening illness from a prescription medication.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Ask your physician to describe the risks and benefits associated with the medications you are being prescribed.</li>
<li>View your prescription before you leave your physician’s office. If the names of the drug, dosage or directions are not legible to you, ask the physician to clarify and write it down for your own records.</li>
<li>When you receive your medication, ask the pharmacist to describe what you are taking the medication for and review the instructions with them.</li>
<li>Check your drug tablets to see if they are the same as you have received in the past.</li>
<li>If you experience side effects from a drug, report it to your physician immediately.</li>
<li>If you are receiving more than on prescription or are already taking medication make sure that the pharmacist discusses interaction risks with you.</li>
</ul>


<p>Burton A. Padove  is currently accepting cases involving  Avandia,  Levaquin and Yaz.   Although he primarily practices in the Chicago area, in Lake County  and Porter County, Indiana as well as Cook County, Illinois,  Mr. Padove represents injury victims throughout Indiana and Illinois, including Marion County and Indianapolis, Indiana.  He can be reached at (219) 836 2200.  You can visit his website at www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[ILLINOIS CLASS ACTION FILED FOR AVANDIA VICTIMS]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/illinois-class-action-filed-for-avandia-victims/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/illinois-class-action-filed-for-avandia-victims/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Class Action Suit for Avandia in Illinois Avandia is a target for over 40 lawsuits filed in Illinois that were filed in St. Clair County Circuit Court in May 2011. There are many other lawsuits throughout the U.S. against the makers of Avandia, a diabetes medication linked to cardiovascular disease and heart attack manufactured by&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Class Action Suit for Avandia in Illinois</strong></p>


<p>Avandia is a target for over 40 lawsuits filed in Illinois that were filed in St. Clair County Circuit Court in May 2011. There are many other lawsuits throughout the U.S. against the makers of Avandia, a diabetes medication linked to cardiovascular disease and heart attack manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. It is contended that GlaxoSmithKline aware of the risk in 2005 but did not properly inform the public. Therefore, people were not permitted to make a well informed decision about the benefits and risks associated with the drug.  The most recent Avandia lawsuits filed in Illinois account for an estimated$600,000 in damages.</p>


<p>Approximately four years ago, The New England Journal of Medicine released a report demonstrating the risk of cardiovascular issues associated with Avandia. The FDA then issued a black box warning about the risk of cardiovascular issues.   The injuries that people using Avandia have experienced include: congestive heart failure, heart attack, stroke, liver failure, bone fractures, vision loss and death.  Despite the request from several interested parties to remove the drug from the consumer market, Avandia has never been recalled in the U.S. Instead, the FDA issued restrictions on the purchase of Avandia. The restrictions include that Avandia only be available at specific pharmacies. People interested in taking Avandia must participate in an educational program about the drug.</p>


<p>GlaxoSmithKline has settled out of court for many cases involving Avandia. The vast majority of the settlements focused on the contention that GlaxoSmithKline was aware of the risk, but did not inform the public.</p>


<p><strong>If you, your family or a friend are victims of Avandia side effects and need to protect their legal rights, contact PADOVE LAW, toll free at (877) 446 5294 for a free consultation.  Burton Padove is licensed in Illinois and Indiana and is ready to assist you.</strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Drug Take Back Day]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/drug-take-back-day/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/drug-take-back-day/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 23:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Drug Take Back Day was in April set by The American Association of Poison Control Centers. Yet, Drug Take Back Day can be every time you complete taking medication to help ensure your medications do not get into the wrong hands or are resold to someone who may be at risk of injury if they&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Drug Take Back Day was in April set by The American Association of Poison Control Centers. Yet, Drug Take Back Day can be every time you complete taking medication to help ensure your medications do not get into the wrong hands or are resold to someone who may be at risk of injury if they take the drug. This is particularly true for narcotics which are associated with risks when not closely monitored by a physician.</p>


<p>Pill abuse and theft is more common than you may think. Medications were the leading cause of poisonous death in 2009. The vast majority of deaths were adults. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health in 2009 noted that more Americans abuse prescription drugs than the number of Americans that abuse cocaine, hallucinogens and heroin combined.</p>


<p>Proper disposal of expired, unused or unwanted prescription drugs is critically important to prevent abuse and theft. In fact, all medications should be properly stored in your home while you are taking them to ensure they do not get in the hands of your children or other outsiders that are not familiar with proper use, drug interactions, risks or possible side effects.</p>


<p>When a prescription medication is prescribed by your physician, your physician has investigated the benefits, risks and possible drug interactions to help ensure that the drug will assist you. Your pharmacist further helps to ensure this by describing how you should use the medication, possible side effects and when to contact a physician if necessary.</p>


<p><strong><em>If you are need of a lawyer due to personal injury, please contact attorney Burton A. Padove at Padove Law at (219) 836 2200.</em></strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Cardiologists and Risk Managers Advised of Class I Recall]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/cardiologists-and-risk-managers-advised-of-class-i-recall/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/cardiologists-and-risk-managers-advised-of-class-i-recall/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:41:29 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Medical Device Recall]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A Class I recall is the most serious type of recall, typically announcing the risk of a life threatening illness due to a defect in a product. Cardiologists and Risk Managers recently received notice that components in the Arstasis One Access System may fracture and/or separate which could result in an emergent life threatening situation.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong> </strong></p>


<p>A Class I recall is the most serious type of recall, typically announcing the risk of a life threatening illness due to a defect in a product. Cardiologists and Risk Managers recently received notice that components in the Arstasis One Access System may fracture and/or separate which could result in an emergent life threatening situation.</p>


<p>The Arstasis One Access System is used to support a diagnostic test during upper leg catheterization procedures. The device supports the diagnostic test by providing access to the vascular system so the cardiologist can identify abnormalities in the vascular system.   The Arstasis One Access System also offers a means to help halt bleeding from the upper leg artery that is being tested.  Cardiologists and Risk Managers will be reporting any emergent situations, health issues or side effects that relate to the malfunction of the component sin the Arstasis One Access System to the FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program.</p>


<p>The Arstasis One Access Systems involved in this recall include: Models: AAD100, AAD101; Part Numbers: FG-02279, FG-03010; Lot Numbers: 09I10268, 1OC26337, 09J06281, 10C12334. These products were distributed for five months beginning May 14, 2010.</p>


<p>Cardiologists are not liable for defective products that cause harm to patients. Of course, all physicians take precautions by examining technology before use. However, physicians are not engineers and cannot be responsible for identifying defects in products. By the same token, sometimes physicians do discover defects, either by viewing an abnormality in the product or seeing a patient with an unusually expected complication following use of the product.</p>


<p>Medical device manufacturers are responsible and can be held liable for any defective product that causes serious injury or death to an individual.  So, there are lawyers who specifically handle cases involving defective medical devices.</p>


<p><strong>If you, your family or a friend have suffered serious inury and need assistance in asserting your legal rights for compensation, contact PADOVE LAW, toll free at (877) 446 5294 for a free consultation.</strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Erectile Dysfunction Drugs Mislabeled as Herbal Dietary Supplements]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/erectile-dysfunction-drugs-mislabeled-as-herbal-dietary-supplements/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/erectile-dysfunction-drugs-mislabeled-as-herbal-dietary-supplements/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced a conclusion from the Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations for the owner of JMM LLC, based out of Rhode Island, who smuggled erectile dysfunction drugs that were called Herbal Dietary Supplements from the People’s Republic of China. The owner of JMM LLC pled guilty to&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced a conclusion from the Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations for the owner of JMM LLC, based out of Rhode Island, who smuggled erectile dysfunction drugs that were called Herbal Dietary Supplements from the People’s Republic of China.</p>


<p>The owner of JMM LLC pled guilty to the charges in the U.S. District Court in Providence, Rhode Island. This was after she imported literally thousands of Durasex and Super Sense One capsules that were mislabeled. U.S. District Court Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi accepted the guilty plea. The results were announced by U.S. Attorney Peter F. Neronha, Mark Dragonetti, Special Agent in Charge of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Office of Criminal Investigations, and Bruce M. Foucart, Special Agent in Charge of ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations in Boston.</p>


<p>Between last quarter of 2006 and last quarter of 2008, JMM LLC, ordered Durasex and Super Sense One capsules from Chengdu Kang Quan Health Product Company, based out of China. The products had false shipping labels and/or invoices. The shipping label and invoices described the products as “Cinnamon Extract,” “Ginseng Extract,” or “Multivitamin samples”. Then, JMM LLC falsely labeled the packages as “Made in the U.S.A.” The packages bearing the false products were distributed to other distributors and retail stores throughout the U.S.</p>


<p>The allegations surfaced after Federal search warrants were executed through a cooperative effort, including:  R.I. FDA/OCI Task Force, comprised of agents from ICE – Homeland Security Investigations; Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigations Division; U.S. Postal Service Inspectors; Rhode Island State Police; North Providence Police; East Providence Police; and the Rhode Island Department of Attorney General. Investigators went to the company’s office and the owner’s home to seize thousands of packages of pills, labeling materials, computers and company documents.  Approximately two years later, the owner was arrested.</p>


<p><strong>If you, your family or a friend have suffered serious injury and need assistance asserting your legal rights for compensation, contact PADOVE LAW, toll free at (877) 446 5294 for a free consultation.</strong>
<strong> </strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Neuro Resource Group Devices Accessories Recall]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/neuro-resource-group-devices-accessories-recall/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/neuro-resource-group-devices-accessories-recall/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:29:28 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Medical Device Recall]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Neuro Resource Group, Inc. manufacturers a variety of medical devices that are sold to people throughout the world. The devices are co-packaged with a variety of accessories, such as, alcohol prep pads, alcohol swabs, and alcohol swab sticks that are manufactured by Triad located in the United States. However, a recall of these accessories was&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Neuro Resource Group, Inc. manufacturers a variety of medical devices that are sold to people throughout the world. The devices are co-packaged with a variety of accessories, such as, alcohol prep pads, alcohol swabs, and alcohol swab sticks that are manufactured by Triad located in the United States. However, a recall of these accessories was recently announced because of an identified risk that the accessories have been contaminated by Bacillus cereus which is a form of bacteria.</p>


<p>This is especially a concern for people who have had surgery, those with weakened immune systems and those who are frail which elevates the risk of developing a life threatening infection from the bacteria.</p>


<p>There are several ways that the affected lots could be labeled, including the terms “Select”, “Select Medical Products”; “PSS Select”, or “PSS World Medical, Inc”. Consumers are being advised to immediately discard the alcohol wipes, known as Triad Group’s Alcohol Prep Pads, associated with the affected lots. Consumers should go directly to the manufacturer’s website to see lot   numbers that are part of the recall or contact the manufacturer directly.  Consumers who must discard their alcohol wipes can visit a local pharmacy and can ask the pharmacist about an appropriate replacement so that the consumers can still use Neuro Resource Group’s devices.    Consumers may also call Neuro Resource Group direct for replacement wipes at 1-877-314-6500.</p>


<p>The Neuro Resource Group’s devices are not contaminated and are still safe to use so the device should not be discarded.</p>


<p>Anyone who feels that they are ill or showing symptoms of an infection should contact their physician immediately.</p>


<p><strong> </strong>
<strong>If you, your family or a friend have suffered serious illness and need assistance in asserting your legal rights for compensation, contact PADOVE LAW, toll free at (877) 446 5294 for a free consultation.</strong>
<strong> </strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Indiana and Illinois Food Recall]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/indiana-and-illinois-food-recall/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/indiana-and-illinois-food-recall/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:25:03 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>St James Smokehouse, Inc. launches a recall for Scotch Reserve Whiskey & Honey Smoked Salmon. The Fresh Market stores in Indiana and Illinois have busy been pulling one of their products off the market this February 2011. Scotch Reserve Whiskey & Honey Smoked Salmon that are 4 ounces have been recalled by St. James Smokehouse,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>St James Smokehouse, Inc. launches a recall for Scotch Reserve Whiskey & Honey Smoked Salmon. The Fresh Market stores in Indiana and Illinois have busy been pulling one of their products off the market this February 2011. Scotch Reserve Whiskey & Honey Smoked Salmon that are 4 ounces have been recalled by  St. James Smokehouse, Inc. for Lot code:5797 & batch code: 4759 with UPC# 853729001151. This is because the company has identified a risk of contamination with Listeria Monocytogenes.</p>


<p>Listeria is one of the more common contaminants linked to food recalls and food borne illness every year. Listeria Monocytogenes is an organism that may produce serious health issues and sometimes fatal consequences, particularly in children, elderly, and those with immunity health issues. People who are healthy may still be adversely affected by Listeria Monocytogenes when exposed to the contaminant. Those who are healthy may suffer from short term high fevers, severe headaches, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea. Those pregnant women infected with Listeria may miscarry and have a stillborn baby.</p>


<p>The company discovered the Listeria link following testing of three sample packages. Only one package tested positive for Listeria Monocytogenes. However, the company has taken precautions by recalling all 600 pounds of the product in that lot that was distributed to sold to The Fresh Market stores.</p>


<p>Stores that receive notice for recalled products must move fast to remove the product from their store and get it off the shelves if the product has reached the shelves. Next time you go to a grocery store and the product you typically purchase is not available, it may be because it was linked to a recall. Of course, this is not always the case. Sometimes, products do run out at stores.  However, there are occasions that the shelf for a particular product will be empty because it has been recalled.</p>


<p><strong>If you, your family or a friend have suffered serious illness and need assistance in asserting your legal rights for compensation, contact PADOVE LAW, toll free at (877) 446 5294 for a free consultation.</strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Sanofi Lawsuits When Drug Linked to Liver Damage]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/sanofi-lawsuits-when-drug-linked-to-liver-damage/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/sanofi-lawsuits-when-drug-linked-to-liver-damage/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Sanofi lawsuits may shortly be underway since two of its drugs have been linked to seizures and liver damage, resulting in serious personal injury. In 2009, the Food and Drug Administration approved Multaq to treat atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation, also known as, irregular heart rhythms that can result in reduced blood flow throughout the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Sanofi lawsuits may shortly be underway since two of its drugs have been linked to seizures and liver damage, resulting in serious personal injury. In 2009, the Food and Drug Administration approved Multaq to treat atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation, also known as, irregular heart rhythms that can result in reduced blood flow throughout the body and consequential strokes. There have been over half million prescriptions dispensed since the drug was approved in 2009. There have also been numerous reports of liver damage and two of these cases involved the removal of the liver for these patients.</p>


<p>Multaq already has a black box warning stating the drug can cause life threatening consequences and death, in people with recent severe heart failure and should not be used in those patients. The common side effects of the drug include: fatigue, loss of strength, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Signs of liver toxicity include: nausea, vomiting and fever in which case patients must have their liver enzymes tested and tests may be required to be repeated on a regular basis to ensure that liver toxicity or other harmful consequences do not occur.</p>


<p>The Sanofi-Aventis SA flu vaccine is also being investigated by health officials due to its link to fever related seizures in children less than two years of age.</p>


<p>These examples provide another reason to examine the labels of medications and read package inserts before taking any medications. A denotation of a black box warning signifies the most serious type of warning for life threatening risks or serious personal injury.  It’s also wise to look for specific information about elevated risks for people with select medical conditions.</p>


<p><strong>If you, your family or a friend have suffered damages and need assistance in asserting your rights for justice and compensation, contact PADOVE LAW, toll free at (877) 446 5294 for a free consultation. </strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Vitamin Water Lawsuit]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/vitamin-water-lawsuit/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/vitamin-water-lawsuit/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Vitamin Water may have associated with healthy living by providing a means for hydration, but the result of its advertising is a lawsuit. Advertisements portraying basketball stars in support of Vitamin Water can lead one to think that Vitamin Water offers health benefits. Of course, it’s true that Vitamin Water contains less sugar than Coca&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Vitamin Water may have associated with healthy living by providing a means for hydration, but the result of its advertising is a lawsuit. Advertisements portraying basketball stars in support of Vitamin Water can lead one to think that Vitamin Water offers health benefits.  Of course, it’s true that Vitamin Water contains less sugar than Coca Cola, the maker of Vitamin Water. Yet, 33 grams of sugar found in Vitamin Water suggest that the beverage is just a step down from the typical soft drink beverage. In fact, many studies suggest that sugar can trigger added caloric intake which contributes to the obesity problem in the U.S. Add to this health care costs for treating the obese, it’s difficult for authorities to accept that a drink, such as,  Vitamin Water containing 33 grams of sugar, offers health benefits.</p>


<p>Authorities weighed in on this topic in a lawsuit brought about by the Center for Science in the Public Interest who alleged that Vitamin Water labels and advertising contain deceptive and unsubstantiated verbiage.  Federal Judge John Gleeson, of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, ruled in favor of the allegations through a 55 page ruling.</p>


<p>Coca Cola did not feel that the company’s advertisements for Vitamin Water were misleading or suggestive that the beverage offers health benefits.  Yet, there is a contention that many consumers may feel that the beverage is nutritional and is preventative for obesity, simply because of the name implication alone.</p>


<p>One of the most reliable reports demonstrating that weight management and loss is best accomplished by reducing caloric intake is in the 2009 report published by the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Researchers at the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health reported that the best way to accomplish such objectives is to reduce or eliminate beverages containing sugar.</p>


<p>A federal judge denied a motion by Coca-Cola to dismiss a class-action lawsuit accusing the soft drink giant of deceptive advertising in its Vitamin Water line, according to a press release from Center for Science in the Public Interest.</p>


<p><strong><em>If you, your family or a friend have suffered damages and need assistance in asserting your rights for justice and compensation, contact PADOVE LAW, toll free at (877) 446 5294 for a free consultation. </em></strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Rolaid, Benadryl and Motrin Recalls]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/316/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/316/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:49:06 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>All lots, totaling 13 million, of Rolaids Extra Strength Softchews, Extra Strength plus Gas Softchews, and Rolaids Multi-Symptom plus Anti-Gas soft chews that were distributed in the United States have been recalled. The reason for the recall is that there have been several complaints that the product is tainted with metal and wood particles. This&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>All lots, totaling 13 million, of Rolaids Extra Strength Softchews, Extra Strength plus Gas Softchews, and Rolaids Multi-Symptom plus Anti-Gas soft chews that were distributed in the United States have been recalled. The reason for the recall is that there have been several complaints that the product is tainted with metal and wood particles. This is the latest in a string of recalls for McNeil Consumer Healthcare, a Division of McNEIL-PPC, Inc.</p>


<p>All lots of Children’s BENADRYL® Allergy FASTMELT® Tablets, in cherry and grape flavors, that were distributed in the United States and some other countries, as well as,  Junior Strength MOTRIN® Caplets, 24 count, have also been recalled.</p>


<p>McNeill has voluntarily conducted these recalls in cooperation with the Food and Drug Administration. The company has also investigated why these incidents have occurred. Following a preliminary investigation, it appears that the foreign particles may have been introduced into the product during manufacturing at a third party facility. McNeill has suspended production of the products until a final outcome has been determined and corrective action has taken place to prevent such incidents from happening again.</p>


<p>People who have any of the affected McNeill products should not use the product and contact McNeil for a refund. Though the risk of serious illness from the recalled products seems to be low, it is important to contact a physician if you are experiencing unusual symptoms after use of any McNeil product.</p>


<p>It is important to note that all drugs are associated with risks.  It is important to read product labels and package inserts about medications before you take them. It is important to review any medications you are taking with your physician.</p>


<p><strong> </strong>
<strong> </strong>
<em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who are injured because of defective products.  He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Oxygen Therapy and Inositol Making False Claims]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/oxygen-therapy-and-inositol-making-false-claims/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/oxygen-therapy-and-inositol-making-false-claims/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:37:49 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>It is buyer beware when any product label says, “Intended to prevent, treat or cure diseases”. It is particularly buyer beware for the website called www.oxygentherapyprogram.com and its products called Oxygen Therapy (35% Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide) and Inositol. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration completed an investigation of 35% Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>It is buyer beware when any product label says, “Intended to prevent, treat or cure diseases”. It is particularly buyer beware for the website called <a href="http://www.oxygentherapyprogram.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.oxygentherapyprogram.com</a> and its products called Oxygen Therapy (35% Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide) and Inositol.</p>


<p>Recently, the Food and Drug Administration completed an investigation of 35% Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide and Inositol and noted several FDA violations. In Fact, the Food and Drug Administration documented that there may be more deficiencies associated with the two products.</p>


<p>First, since the products are intended to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent disease, they fall under the category of classified drugs defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. As such, these products must be recognized as safe and effective for their labeled uses. However, these drugs were not approved by the FDA for safety and efficacy. In addition, new drugs that fall under the classification of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act are not permitted to be introduced to the public until they have been approved. Both 35% Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide and Inositol have been sold to the public without FDA approval.   The FDA also discovered that the product label did not provide adequate directions for a person to use the product without the advice of a physician. This is a misbranding violation.</p>


<p>The Food and Drug Administration has warned <a href="http://www.oxygentherapyprogram.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.oxygentherapyprogram.com</a> to correct their violations immediately or be subject to possible enforcement action, such as illegal product seizure, criminal prosecution, or an injunction against the manufacturer and distributors of <a href="http://www.oxygentherapyprogram.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.oxygentherapyprogram.com</a> products.</p>


<p>Buyers of online medical products should be wary of claims stating that a specific product fights off disease, kills viruses, or thwarts off systematic conditions. Before purchasing an online medical product, bring a print out of the product description and any related information to your physician for his or her review and approval.</p>


<p><em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who have been misrepresented. He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Implantable and Un-implantable Hearing Aid Sends Shock Waves to Users]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/implantable-and-un-implantable-hearing-aid-sends-shock-waves-to-users/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/implantable-and-un-implantable-hearing-aid-sends-shock-waves-to-users/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Medical Device Recall]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Advanced Bionics took swift action to recall the company’s HiRes 90K cochlear implant device and all un-implantable devices that have been distributed. This hearing aid recall was initiated following two reports from users who experienced excessively loud sounds, shocking sensations and a high level of discomfort. These side effects occurred within eight to ten days&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Advanced Bionics took swift action to recall the company’s HiRes 90K cochlear implant device and all un-implantable devices that have been distributed. This hearing aid recall was initiated following two reports from users who experienced excessively loud sounds, shocking sensations and a high level of discomfort. These side effects occurred within eight to ten days of initial use of the hearing aid.</p>


<p>At present, Advanced Bionics does not know why the HiRes 90K cochlear implant device and the company’s unimplantable devices are producing such side effects. The company is working with the Food and Drug Administration to determine the root cause that prompted the hearing aid recall. Typically, flaws in the design of the product or in safeguards of the product are the reasons for malfunction in products.</p>


<p>Hearing aids have come a long way from the first ear trumpet style versions of the 1700’s. By the mid 1850’s, a thin metal device was designed to meet specific needs for the hearing impaired. Nearing the 1900’s, ear tubes with speaker connections gained popularity. By the 1940’s, more modern hearing aids were developed and were offered in a variety of sizes to meet the specific needs of individual users. By the end of the 50’s, hearing aid styles were smaller due to advancements in microphone and battery technology.  In the 1990’s, digital processing hearing aids took over the marketplace, which provided greater clarity, a full range of tones and a more discreet appearance.  With the advent of digital technology, designs specifications have changed and hearing aid manufacturers are dedicated to creating advanced design specifications that do not pose risks for consumers.</p>


<p>Hearing aid companies that uncover risks in their products must perform an investigation to determine the reason for the risk. The company must correct the problem in order to sell the product to the public.</p>


<p><em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who are injured because of defective products.  He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Duro Extend Capsules Recall: Another Dietary Supplement Down!]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/duro-extend-capsules-recall-another-dietary-supplement-down/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/duro-extend-capsules-recall-another-dietary-supplement-down/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The dietary supplement known as Duro Extend Capsules, manufactured by Intelli Health Products, has been recalled throughout the nation. Intelli Health Products took this step after the Food and Drug Administration produced results from an analysis of the product showing that it contains Sulfoaidenafil. Sulfoaidenafil is an ingredient that is FDA approved for the treatment&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>The dietary supplement known as Duro Extend Capsules, manufactured by Intelli Health Products, has been recalled throughout the nation.  Intelli Health Products took this step after the Food and Drug Administration produced results from an analysis of the product showing that it contains Sulfoaidenafil.  Sulfoaidenafil is an ingredient that is FDA approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.  The reason why Sulfoaidenafil must be FDA approved is because the drug can negatively interact with other prescription drugs when taken together, such as with nitroglycerin. In addition, Duro Extend Capsules may lower your blood pressure to a high risk level. These two noted risks place people with high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol and heart disease in danger for serious adverse reactions that may be life threatening when taking Duro Extend Capsules with their prescriptions for their medical condition.</p>


<p>Duro Extend Capsules<strong> </strong>are sold across the U.S. in a blister pack containing one capsule per unit, 12-pack, 24-pack display boxes, or 3 count and 10 count bottles. All lot numbers have been recalled by Intelli Health Products.</p>


<p>People who have experienced an adverse reaction when using the dietary supplement should contact their physician immediately. All consumers using the product should stop using it immediately and return the unused portion to the place of purchase.</p>


<p>Quality assurance testing at Intelli Health Products did not include a test for Sulfoaidenafil so Intelli Health Products was unaware that Sulfoaidenafil was contained in Duro Extend Capsules until the FDA conducted its analysis.</p>


<p>Over-the-counter and online products are not necessarily regulated by the FDA. It is often the manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure the product is safe and effective. In recent years, the FDA has stepped in to conduct testing of over-the-counter and online products. Yet, the number of products available online alone are so high it can be all, but impossible for the FDA to manage over-the-counter regulatory affairs.  Therefore, consumers must proceed with caution when purchasing online products. It is wise to check with your physician before using any over-the-counter or online product.</p>


<p><em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who are injured because of defective products.  He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Darvocet and Darvon are Off the Market, After 32 Years!]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/darvocet-and-darvon-are-off-the-market-after-32-years/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/darvocet-and-darvon-are-off-the-market-after-32-years/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Last year alone, roughly 10 million people in the U.S. used propoxyphene, known under the brand names Darvocet and Darvon, to relieve post operative pain. It is unknown how many people have died or been seriously injured since the drug was approved in 1957. Recently, Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group, petitioned the Food and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Last year alone, roughly 10 million people in the U.S. used propoxyphene, known under the brand names Darvocet and Darvon, to relieve post operative pain.  It is unknown how many people have died or been seriously injured since the drug was approved in 1957. Recently, Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group, petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to ban the drugs from the U.S. market, stating that the drugs caused over 2000 deaths, are highly addictive, and are not more effective than other safer pain relievers.</p>


<p>In June 2010, Public Citizen alleged that the Food and Drug Administration violated the law by failing to act on a petition that was originally filed in 2006. The FDA discovered over 3000 serious side effect cases involving Darvocet or Darvon. In December of this year, Darvocet and Darvon have been banned from the U.S. market.</p>


<p>The list of life threatening side effects associated with Darvocet and Darvon include: serious or fatal heart arrhythmia, heart attack, cardiac arrest, heart valve issues, myocardial infarction, pacemaker implantation, overdose, and suicide. The Public Citizen group determined that the risks associated with Darvocet and Darvon outweighs the benefit of pain relief, which can be accomplished by other less harmful drugs.</p>


<p>Darvocet has been one of the top twenty five drugs prescribed by physicians in recent years. Darvocet combines the active ingredient in Darvon, known as propoxyphene, with acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol.</p>


<p>Groups like Public Citizen are taking strides to better protect the public from harm by acting as a watchdog for consumers. Personal injury attorneys assisting people who have been injured by drugs are also part of the check and balance system for protecting the public.</p>


<p><em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who are injured because of defective products.  He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[JP Morgan Chase Lawsuits in U.S. District Illinois Court and California State Court Seek Class Action]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/jp-morgan-chase-lawsuits-in-u-s-district-illinois-court-and-california-state-court-seek-class-action/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/jp-morgan-chase-lawsuits-in-u-s-district-illinois-court-and-california-state-court-seek-class-action/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In October 2010, JP Morgan Chase announced that the company would be temporarily suspending certain foreclosure processes following the discovery that court documents were not being properly reviewed by third party personnel. JP Morgan Chase had allocated some of its foreclosure verification processes to third party foreclosure companies. However, JP Morgan determined that the personnel&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>In October 2010, JP Morgan Chase announced that the company would be temporarily suspending certain foreclosure processes following the discovery that court documents were not being properly reviewed by third party personnel. JP Morgan Chase had allocated some of its foreclosure verification processes to third party foreclosure companies. However, JP Morgan determined that the personnel at the third party companies were not reviewing or properly notarizing foreclosure affidavits before signing off on them.</p>


<p>Consequently, two lawsuits have been filed against JP Morgan Chase regarding their methods for managing foreclosures. The lawsuits were specifically filed against Washington Mutual Bank and JPMorgan Chase & Co in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and against Chase Home Finance in California state court.</p>


<p>The allegations in the lawsuit are common law fraud and misrepresentation, as well as violations of state consumer fraud statutes. It is not known who filed the lawsuits at this time. JP Morgan also indicated that the company is being sued for mortgage backed securities by other companies, such as Charles Schwab and Cambridge Place Investment Management. For this reason, class action status seems appropriate to some.</p>


<p>The U.S. mortgage crisis does not cease to exist.  And JP Morgan is not the only bank that has been adversely affected by faulty foreclose processes. Currently, several other banks have lawsuits filed against them, including:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Bank of America lawsuit involving investors who purchased over $375 million in mortgage backed securities</li>
<li>Citigroup, Inc. lawsuit, in part, for inappropriate underwriting of residential mortgage backed securities.</li>
<li>Wells Fargo & Co. has several class action lawsuits filed against them.</li>
</ul>


<p>Delayed foreclosure processing may open the door for consumers to sue banks on a large scale, potentially leading to another class action lawsuit for banks across the U.S.</p>


<p><em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who are injured because of defective products.  He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Chinese Dry Wall Lawsuits]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/chinese-dry-wall-lawsuits/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/chinese-dry-wall-lawsuits/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A year ago, it was difficult to know who to sue for the health issues and property damage caused by defective Chinese Dry Wall located in homes across the U.S. Recently, a $2.6 million verdict came back in favor of seven Virginia homeowners who were adversely affected by Chinese Dry Wall. This verdict lays the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>A year ago, it was difficult to know who to sue for the health issues and property damage caused by defective Chinese Dry Wall located in homes across the U.S. Recently, a $2.6 million verdict came back in favor of seven Virginia homeowners who were adversely affected by Chinese Dry Wall. This verdict lays the foundation for thousands of others to receive financial compensation for the injuries they have sustained because of the dry wall. The Chinese Dry Wall lawsuit claims are being overseen by a federal judge in New Orleans. This is considered multidistrict litigation (MDL), but you can contact a local attorney if you feel you have been injured by Chinese Dry Wall.</p>


<p>If you have experienced serious respiratory infections, sinus infections, rashes, hair loss, hospitalization or irreparable damage to your home’s air conditioning unit, heating unit, electricity or plumbing, your damages may be linked to Chinese Dry Wall. It is not uncommon for all household members to become ill from Chinese Dry Wall.</p>


<p>People who live in homes with Chinese Dry Wall should evacuate because of the risk of toxicity and unknown long term side effects. There is also no viable means to remedy Chinese Dry Wall toxicity and damage, making the financial loss for property very high.  It is also unknown how Chinese Dry Wall will affect the groundwater supply in areas that have homes built with this type of dry wall.</p>


<p>Between 2001 and 2008, the chance that home were built with Chinese Dry Wall are higher when compared to other years. This is because of the real estate boom in those years which forced some home builders to go outside of the U.S. for dry wall and building supplies. In 2007, home builder incomes rose to nearly $768 billion.  The damage to property from Chinese Dry Wall includes:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Rotten egg smelling odor</li>
<li>Failure of appliances, including HVAC systems and coils      in air conditioners, stoves and refrigerators</li>
<li>Corroded electrical wiring</li>
</ul>


<p>
<em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who are injured because of defective products.  He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Indiana Lawsuits for the DePuy ASR Hip Implant May Be Centralized]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/indiana-lawsuits-for-the-depuy-asr-hip-implant-may-be-centralized/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/indiana-lawsuits-for-the-depuy-asr-hip-implant-may-be-centralized/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:13:12 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Medical Device Recall]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>On November 18, 2010, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation will meet in Durham North Carolina to decide if all states’, including Indiana, DePuy ASR Hip Implant lawsuits should be heard in one court. This outcome is the result of the high number of lawsuits that are being brought against the company, estimated at&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>On November 18, 2010, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation will meet in Durham North   Carolina to decide if all states’, including Indiana, DePuy ASR Hip Implant lawsuits should be heard in one court.  This outcome is the result of the high number of lawsuits that are being brought against the company, estimated at 4000 to date and thousands more expected because consumers who have this hip implant are still learning about the risks.</p>


<p>The DePuy ASR Hip Implant was recalled by the FDA following a report by the National Joint Registry of England and Wales which demonstrated that 1 out of every 8 patients who received the DePuy ASR Hip Implant had undergone revision surgery within a five year time period after the initial placement of the implant. Typically, a hip implant should be long lasting, at least 15 years.  Revision hip surgery is real surgery that is very invasive, requires a significant recover time period and is associated with risks. There has also been an additional warning about metal on metal hip implants, such as the DePuy ASR Hip Implant, which can cast metal particles into the body, causing soft tissue damage and inflammatory responses that may lead to bone loss.</p>


<p>People who have filed lawsuits are those who have undergone revision hip surgery or are concerned about the increased risks associated with the hip implant. Approximately, 93,000 DePuy ASR Hip Implants were distributed throughout the U.S.</p>


<p>The basis for the lawsuits is that DePuy, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, did not sufficiently test the hip implant and failed to warn the public or issue a recall in a timely fashion.   It is suspected that the DePuy ASR hip implant has a defect in the design of the acetabular cup, which is shallower than acetabular cups made by other medical device companies, making it more likely to fail. .</p>


<p><em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who are injured because of defective medical devices.  He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Indiana Nose Surgery Doc Facing Hundreds of Medical Malpractice Cases]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/280/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/280/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:26:04 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Thousands of surgeons perform nose surgery, but the level of training and expertise varies among surgeons. In fact, there are over 150 self designated boards in plastic surgery, but the only ones that align with the goals of American Board of Medical Specialties are the American Board of Plastic Surgery, the American Board of Facial&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Thousands of surgeons perform nose surgery, but the level of training and expertise varies among surgeons. In fact, there are over 150 self designated boards in plastic surgery, but the only ones that align with the goals of American Board of Medical Specialties are the American Board of Plastic Surgery, the <a href="http://www.yourplasticsurgeryguide.com/choose-surgeon/abfprs.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">American Board of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery </a> <a href="http://www.yourplasticsurgeryguide.com/choose-surgeon/abo.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">American Board of Otolaryngology</a>. These factors can make it difficult for people interested in nose surgery to select the right nose surgeon. Yet, it is not typical to find a nose surgeon who is faced with more than 300 medical malpractice cases, as is the case for Mark Weinberger, also known as “The Nose Doc”.</p>


<p>In August 2010, a Lake Superior   Court put forward a $300,000 medical malpractice verdict against Mark Weinberger. This case involved William Boyer, 58, of Gary, Indiana who was told by Mark Weinberger that he needed surgery to repair bloody sinuses. Conversely, Mark Weinberger presented photos of another patient who needed surgery to Mr. Boyer, as if the photos were Mr. Boyer’s photos. Consequently, Mr. Boyer had unnecessary nose surgery. The allegations included that the Merrillville physician had mistreated and misdiagnosed William Boyer. Weinberger had operated the Merrillville  Center for Advanced Surgery LLC and Nose and Sinus Centers LLC between November 2002 and 2004.</p>


<p>In 2004, Mark Weinberger was featured on an episode of “America’s Most Wanted because he failed to return from a trip to Greece. In 2006, 22 counts of health care fraud perpetuated against insurance companies were filed in U.S. District Court in Hammond. In total, roughly 300 medical malpractice cases have been filed against the nose surgeon.</p>


<p><strong>Selecting a Nose Surgeon</strong></p>


<p>It is important to carefully select your medical providers and surgeons. Check out some tips to help you make a well educated decision.</p>


<p><strong>Board Certification Verification:</strong> Visit the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) or call (800) 776-2378.</p>


<p><strong>Physician Credentials, Medical Malpractice Allegations, and Disciplinary Action:</strong> Visit your state’s medical board website or call them.</p>


<p><strong>Hospital Privileges: </strong>When a physician has<strong> </strong>hospital privileges to perform a specific procedure, the physician’s skill set has been reviewed by peer members.</p>


<p><strong>Accredited Facility Verification: C</strong>ontact the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.</p>


<p><strong>General Anesthesiologist Verification: </strong>Contact the American Board of Anesthesiology at (919) 881-2570.</p>


<p><em>Burton Padove, Indiana and Illinois lawyer, is available to help those who are injured because of products that are recalled. He can be reached at (877) 446 5294.</em><strong></strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[ACE Inhibitors Linked to Birth Defects]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/ace-inhibitors-linked-to-birth-defects/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/ace-inhibitors-linked-to-birth-defects/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:47:57 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>On all drug package inserts, you will notice a list of associated risks which have been identified through studies that the scientists’ manufacturers had performed and/or through independent clinical trials in which patients used the drug to be monitored for the purpose of identifying health risks posed by the drug. Every drug has associated risks.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><em>On all drug package inserts, you will notice a list of associated risks which have been identified through studies that the scientists’ manufacturers had performed and/or through independent clinical trials in which patients used the drug to be monitored for the purpose of identifying health risks posed by the drug. Every drug has associated risks. Yet, sometimes the risks are not identities until after the drug reaches the market. So, patients taking drugs may not be informed about such risks. This is a time when a lawsuit can be filed against the manufacturer for failure to identify and properly disclose the risk of the injury to the patient.</em></p>


<p>In 2006, ACE inhibitors, commonly known as high blood pressure, heart failure, preventing kidney medications, were linked to birth defects. This comes 25 years after catopril (ACE inhibitor) had been placed on the market with an average of 42 million users annually (2.7 million of which were of child bearing age). According to IMS, a pharmaceutical information company, the total market for ACE inhibitors in 2009 was $3.8 billion in 2009 with over 150 million prescriptions filled annually.</p>


<p><strong>The following is a partial list of ACE Inhibitors, including:</strong>
</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Capoten (captopril)</li>
<li>Vasotec (enalapril)</li>
<li>Prinivil, Zestril (lisinopril)</li>
<li>Lotensin (benazepril)</li>
<li>Monopril (fosinopril)</li>
<li>Altace (ramipril)</li>
<li>Accupril (quinapril)</li>
<li>Aceon (perindopril)</li>
<li>Mavik (trandolapril)</li>
</ul>


<p>If you need a lawyer, call Burton Padove at 219-836-2200.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[What You Should Know about Military Disability Compensation]]></title>
                <link>https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/what-you-should-know-about-military-disability-compensation/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.indianapersonalinjurylawyer.net/blog/what-you-should-know-about-military-disability-compensation/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Padove Law]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Class Action Lawsuits]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>You have the right to ask for help. Claims for disability can be filed at your local VA office, VA medical facility and online. You may also request the assistance of a private attorney who can help to ensure that your claim is filed properly. This particularly holds true should you disagree with the disability&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><em><strong>You have the right to ask for help. </strong>Claims for disability can be filed at your local VA office, VA medical facility and online. You may also request the assistance of a private attorney who can help to ensure that your claim is filed properly. This particularly holds true should you disagree with the disability rating you receive from your physician or if you have received a denial for your claim. * Your disability rating relates to the amount that you would be awarded for your disability. </em>
<strong>Meet Deadlines. </strong>As with all applications, there are deadlines. Do not miss any deadlines under any circumstances. One deadline you will not want to forget about is the appeal deadline. Should you appeal your disability rating, you must file your appeal (Notice of Disagreement) within a year following the denial or rating decision by the VA.</p>


<p>You can learn about deadlines from the above mentioned parties</p>


<p><strong>Rest Assured that Increased Compensation is Possible. </strong>You may receive reconsideration for your denial and possibly increase your disability rating for a higher compensation rate should your condition become worse over time.  These conditions include, but are not limited to, Post Traumatic Stress and back pain.</p>


<p><strong>Hire a Lawyer for Appeals. </strong> The appeals process can be complex. It is wise to omit any risk of inaccurate or incomplete information. For this reason, it is advised to visit a Veteran’s Disability Attorney who can prepare Veteran Disability paperwork, file appeals and attend Board of Veteran Appeals hearings with you.</p>


<p>If you need a lawyer, call Burton Padove at 219-836-2200.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>